Transformation of the Sentencing Paradigm in Indonesia: A Juridical Study of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code

Transformasi Paradigma Penetapan Hukuman di Indonesia: Studi Hukum tentang Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru

Authors

  • Syaifullah Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v9i1.14

Keywords:

New Criminal Code, Restorative Justice, Sentencing, Criminal Justice System

Abstract

The enactment of the New Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana/KUHP) through Law Number 1 of 2023 has brought about fundamental changes in the direction and paradigm of national sentencing policy in Indonesia. One of the most notable reforms is the explicit recognition of the principle of restorative justice as an alternative mechanism for resolving criminal cases beyond a purely retributive approach. This article aims to analyse the juridical position of restorative justice within the framework of the New Criminal Code and its implications for the national criminal justice system, encompassing the stages of investigation, prosecution, and sentencing. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and policy approaches, through an examination of legislation, legal doctrines, and contemporary literature and policy developments from the period 2022–2025. The findings indicate that the New Criminal Code provides a more progressive normative foundation for the application of restorative justice; however, the effectiveness of its implementation remains dependent on the formulation of comprehensive technical regulations, the enhancement of law enforcement capacity, accountable monitoring mechanisms, and a structured and equitable system of victim protection.

References

Al., Andrew von Hirsch et. Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Kencana, 2022.

———. Penal Policy and Criminal Law Development. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2011.

Braithwaite, J. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation: Building Trust in Legal Systems. Routledge, 2023.

Braithwaite, John. Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

———. “Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 36, no. 3 (2016): 475-498.

———. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Daly, Kathleen. “Restorative Justice: The Real Story.” Punishment & Society Vol. 4, no. 1 (2002): 55–79.

Doak, Jonathan, and David O’Mahony. “The Problem of Consistency in Restorative Justice.” Criminal Law Review (UK), no. 5 (2011): 325–44.

(eds.), Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness. Handbook of Restorative Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishin, 2011.

Europe, Council of. Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)8 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning Restorative Justice in Criminal Matters. Strasbourg, 2018.

(IJRS), Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. Catatan Kritis Terhadap Pengaturan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Policy Brief, 2024.

———. Evaluasi Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta, 2024.

———. Restorative Justice Policy Report. Jakarta, 2023.

Indonesia, Mahkamah Agung Republik. Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2024.

———. Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta, 2024.

———. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif. Jakarta, 2024.

Karjono, Arpandi, Malau, Parningotan, and Ciptono. “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana Berbasis Kearifan Lokal.” Jurnal USM Law Review Vol. 7, no. 2 (n.d.): 1035–50. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9571.

Kristyanto, Hermawan Gregorius, Ramadan, Tubagus Ahmad, Manurung, and Jefferson Hakim. “Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Melalui Pendekatan Dual-Track System Dalam Tindak Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia.” IJTIHAD: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam 19, no. 2 (n.d.): 393–418. https://doi.org/10.21111/ijtihad.v19i2.15423.

LPSK. Policy Brief: Integrasi Perlindungan Korban Dalam Skema Restorative Justice. Jakarta: LPSK, 2025.

(LPSK), Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Laporan Pemantauan Pelaksanaan Kesepakatan Restoratif. Jakarta: LPSK, 2025.

———. Laporan Tahunan Perlindungan Korban Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Jakarta: LPSK, 2025.

(LPSK), Witness and Victim Protection Agency. Annual Report on Victim Protection. Jakarta, 2024.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Muladi. Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik, Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2011.

———. Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik, Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2011.

———. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas, 2015.

———. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: UNDIP Press, 2015.

———. Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat Dan Sistem Pemidanaan. Bandung: Alumni, 2008.

Nawa, Barda, and Wi Arief. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Ningtias, and et al Ayu Dian. “The Principle of Restorative Justice in sentencingIn the 2023 Criminal Code.” Jurnal INDEPENDENT Vol. 11, no. 2 (n.d.): 563–74. https://doi.org/DOI:https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v11i2.354.%2520Satjipto%2520Rahardjo,%2520Progressive%2520Law:%2520A%2520Synthesis%2520of%2520Indonesian%2520Law,%2520(Yogyakarta:%2520Genta%2520Publishing,%25202009),%2520p.%2520112.

Pemasyarakatan, Direktorat Jenderal. Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM RI, Statistik Pemasyarakatan Indonesia Tahun 2024. Jakarta, 2025.

Rahardjo. S. Hukum Progresif: Kajian Teoritis Dan Aplikatif Dalam Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2022.

Thayiban, M. Keadilan Restoratif Dan Kearifan Lokal: Integrasi Nilai Musyawarah Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2024.

(UNODC), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes, 2nd Ed. Vienna: UNODC, 2020.

Zakran, Eka Putra, Panjaitan, Budi Sastra, Harahap, and Arifuddin Muda. “Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Korban: Studi Kritis Terhadap Penguatan Hak Korban Dalam Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora Vol. 4, no. 3 (n.d.): 713–25.

Zehr, Howard. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. New York: Good Books, 2015.

———. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. New York: Good Books, 2015.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum, (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2024).

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif, (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2024).

Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.

Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.

Downloads

Submitted

15-01-2026

Accepted

25-01-2026

Published

28-01-2026

How to Cite

Syaifullah. (2026). Transformation of the Sentencing Paradigm in Indonesia: A Juridical Study of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code: Transformasi Paradigma Penetapan Hukuman di Indonesia: Studi Hukum tentang Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru. Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law, 9(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v9i1.14